Wednesday, November 29, 2006

New Atheists

A recent South Park featured your and my favorite author of The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins, as a fundamentalist atheist. I was curious about his actual position on atheism, and came across this article in Wired about a movement called the "New Atheists" led by Dawkins that rejects all forms of religion as logically unsound and intellectually destructive. After years of defending agnosticism to my deeply religious family, it seems an enticing concept: embracing the outright banishment of religious and supernatural beliefs to the same realm as Flying Spaghetti Monsters.


Here's an interesting personal take on the article and the issues in general by a guy at Brown I've had a few cog sci classes with and whose blog I secretly read.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Time-Wasters, Rejoice!

Those of you looking to continue wasting time with TV shows online, this is your day.

We all know that tvlinks.voodeedoo.org is down, but I have found two replacement sites. The first is here and appears to be an older version of the website. It might just be a similar site though. I have also found the british version of the website, located here here. This one's identical to the original.

Enjoy. Those of you in school, don't fail anything because of this. I'd almost be mildly upset if you did.

-Yoshi

Also, to any of you who are watching Scrubs online, I do have all 5 seasons on my computer. Ask and ye shall receive upon my next visit. Oh, and the new season starts Thursday.

Friday, November 24, 2006

Technology cont'd

As I sit here in Longmeadow, mooching my neighbor's wireless signal and waiting for X-Men to download, I thought this would be a good time to post. In response to Bryan's last comments about the wonders of technology and what that means for the future of shared media and the creative artist:

(actually, citing an example rather than responding...)

The other day, as I was watching an episode of Scrubs via internt TV, a song played during the show which I really liked. My interest piqued, I rewound the file to listen to the lyrics again, tabbed a new Mozilla window, typed those lyrics into a Google search, and found the artist/title of that song. A few more clicks had Soulseek open, and by the time the episode was over, I had a brand new song to listen to. I downloaded some more songs by that same artist, The Coral, and I found out they're a pretty decent band. I then seeded a Pandora radio station from them and found a whole slew of similar music that I'm getting into. After I took a break from the furious internetting, I realized something.

All of that stuff I just did, which took all of 20 minutes, would have taken an obnoxiously long time 10 or 15 years ago. I would have waited for the TV network to air a rerun of the same Scrubs episode in order to learn those lyrics (unless one of my pals managed to catch them), and once I had them, how would I figure out what song it was? "Hey, Diana, have you heard a song that goes something like this" at which point I'd awkwardly sing the poorly remembered tune. Assuming I finally tracked down the name of the song or who performed it, how would I get it in order to listen to it at my leisure? Sure, I could go buy their CD, but for the sake of argument let's stick to moneyless means of acquisition. I would need to find a radio station that played similar music, and then pray I'd be quick enough with the "record" button on my tape deck when the desired song finally came on. If I didn't mind the cut-off intro or the DJ's voice pre-empting the end, I would finally have my song.

I'm truly amazed at how far technology has come, and I'm eagerly looking forward to media being even more shared and boundless. However, the problem that's going to need tackling is, like Bryan said, how to provide compensation for those creative and productive forces. Because, while shared music and TV etc are incredibly attractive ideals, when property is owned by everyone, it isn't owned by anyone.

That being said, I'm so pissed that tvlinksvoodeedoo isn't working right now, and my addiction will have to be curbed for yet another day. Damn technology.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

This site has changed my life. Thank you Andrew Laubscher, wherever you are!

Happenings as a result of this site:
  • Bevan skips orgo regularly and is watching 20 episodes of Scrubs a day.
  • I overslept most of Neuropharmacology today because I watched all of season 2 of The (American) Office last night. And it was cannabinoid day too.
  • "Metalocalypse," Brendon (Home Movies) Small's new show sucks, despite squealing guitars and eyeballs popping and blood and the death rain and the hey hey it hurts so good so hard and so metal. I really really wanted to like this show, but watching every episode confirmed that yes, it sucks.
  • Remember the Zelda cartoon?
  • Remember when the Simpsons was good?
  • Remember when Dave Chapelle was the host of his own show?
  • Remember the cuttlefish squid battle on Iron Chef?
  • I guess these questions aren't really "happenings" but neither is this thought: This seems like such a good model for the future of information/media on the internet. With the rise of YouTube, MySpace etc., the internet is fast and developed enough that people can post whatever they want to share, copyrighted or not, only to be ripped down by angry corporations, only to be reposted by fans with no lives, and finally to be given up on by now reluctantly complacent corporations. Eventually, everything converted/scanned/recorded digitally will be un-killable -- all media will be instantly atainable. What this means for the ability by the artist/writer/musician to make a living remains to be seen, but what seems clear is that the unfettered propogation of digital media is increasingly impossible to regulate.

Patrick Stewart is awesome

This link courtesy of Josh.